data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/283df/283df6c0eddd94bac5842ddca9078f479c6f3eac" alt=""
Using this
trendy tool, I found that the volume of news references to "Barack Obama", "John Edwards" and "Hilary Clinton" appear to be in line with the Washington Post's
election results, as pictured below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c20b/2c20b5524da67105787c500ec82fbeb5328b4357" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19542/1954262259f8d8396660ffef98132e8e595000d4" alt=""
The Republican race appears to be no different: the sheer volume of references to any particular candidate appears to have been a leading indicator in determining the caucus winners in Iowa. Media tycoons are constantly reminding just how much power they have in democratic regimes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/887be/887be2ca826b3c0f68a2b691853732fd2ce73e8a" alt=""
Lastly, another striking comparison: Britney Spears has been consistently higher in search volume than Barack Obama all year, even though there have been fewer news references to her.
1 comment:
That's seriously frightening...I mean 1984 frightening (hold me).
Post a Comment